Top Ten Tuesday: My Unpopular Bookish Opinions

Thank you to That Artsy Reader Girl for hosting Top Ten Tuesday.

Oh, boy, here we go with my top ten unpopular bookish opinions. Take it easy on me. Lol.

  1. I’m not a fan of Taylor Jenkins Reid’s books. (Ducks for cover).
  2. Romance is not on my go-to list. (I do read them from time to time).
  3. I LOVE the Oxford comma. (Luckily I’m already under cover).
  4. I love time travel fiction, but if a woman is flung two or three hundred years in the past after finding a big, magical, blue diamond on the beach, she is NOT going to immediately attract the kind attention of a nobleman or rich man, and they are NOT going to fall madly in love. That’s not how that all worked. Most likely, IF she’s lucky, she’ll be hauled off for indecent exposure and end up in an asylum at some point.
  5. I don’t enjoy Stephen King’s writing.
  6. I’m not a fan of stream of consciousness.
  7. If I read a romance, I don’t enjoy the “enemies to lovers” trope.
  8. I think Outlander is okay, but I don’t love it. I haven’t read all the books in the series and don’t want to.
  9. I don’t understand why people have trouble knowing when to use “loose” or “lose.”
  10. I don’t think writers have to follow Stephen King’s “rules of writing,” particularly when it comes to adverbs.

HOW ABOUT YOU? What are your unpopular bookish opinions?

31 thoughts on “Top Ten Tuesday: My Unpopular Bookish Opinions”

  1. A good list. I’m not a fan of Stephen King either and get bored with romance novels. But it’s a good thing we all like different types of writing and books.


  2. Great list, you forced me to think about mine.


    I’m Tudor-ed out. Don’t get me wrong, I loved Wolf Hall et al but for pity’s sake there are other periods of history.


    Can’t bear celebrity memoir. They are selling a product I don’t want to buy.


    Love memoirs written by people you’ve never heard of before. They are a real slice of history that doesn’t appear in text books.


    Romance no, especially if HEA is mandatory.


    Love stories, yes. There’s nothing more interesting than people.


    Amazed & excited by the wonderful novels coming out of Ireland but (very soft whisper) Sally Rooney doesn’t do it for me. I’ll leave now.

  3. #4 is great! I think 99.9% of people would be in big trouble if they were suddenly thrown back in time 200+ years due to not knowing the social customs, laws, etc of that era. (Not to mention all of the germs back then that our bodies may not be able to fight off very well!)


  4. Four and five…absolutely. As for loose and lose, I definitely know the difference but I am certain I have added or subtracted an “o” by accident a time or two.


  5. Great list! I feel the same way about Outlander. I tried to read the first book, but the size of it turned me off. I did watch a few seasons of the TV show and enjoyed that. Agree about the time travel. I love that genre, but people don’t just transport to another era and fall in love like that.


  6. I agree with many of your points, particularly the Oxford comma and instant love in time travel stories. Maybe I’m showing my age (over 60), but I’d like to know when people started getting confused about the difference between nauseous and nauseated. They mean very different things, and I rarely see nauseous used correctly in recent years.

    I’ve finally started to explain it this way to people: nauseous and nauseated are similar to poisonous and poisoned. People don’t feel “poisonous” (except in science fiction perhaps?), and they don’t feel “nauseous.” If you’re sick to your stomach, then something that is nauseous (like rotting meat or sour milk) has made you feel nauseated.

    Rant over.

Leave a Reply